AI & ML interests
None defined yet.
Recent Activity
Precise Debugging Benchmarking (PDB)
ā Neurips'26: Evaluations & Datasets
š Paper Ā· š» Code Ā· š Project page Ā· š Leaderboard
PDB is an automatic pipeline that turns any coding dataset into a debugging benchmark with fine-grained metrics. Beyond binary unit-test scores, PDB evaluates a debugger with edit-level precision (did the model touch only the lines it had to?) and bug-level recall (did it fix every fault?). This rewards targeted fixes and penalizes the regeneration behavior frontier LLMs often fall back on.
Frontier models like GPT-5.1-Codex and DeepSeek-V3.2-Thinking top unit-test leaderboards (>76%) but score at or below 45% on precision: they pass tests by rewriting, not repairing. PDB makes that gap measurable.
Released datasets
| Dataset | Size | Bug granularity | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| PDB-Single | 5,751 | single line | main evaluation set: tasks not easily solved by 7+ of 9 reference models |
| PDB-Single-Full | 7,589 | single line | full initial pool before easy-case filtering |
| PDB-Wild | 484 | multi-line / repository-level | PDB-Multi (256) + SWE-smith repository bugs (228) |
| PDB-Multi | 256 | 2ā4 line blocks | BigCodeBench/LiveCodeBench part of PDB-Wild; programs with ā„35 LOC |
| PDB-Results | ā | ā | model outputs and scores |
PDB-Single, PDB-Single-Full and PDB-Multi are derived from BigCodeBench and LiveCodeBench; PDB-Wild adds SWE-smith repositories. All are built by the PDB pipeline and evaluated with precision / recall / unit-test pass rate.
Citation
@article{chai2026pdb,
title={Precise Debugging Benchmark: Is Your Model Debugging or Regenerating?},
author={Chai, Miaosen and Zhu, Wang Bill and Wang, Shangshang and Liu, Yejia and Bian, Song and Dong, Honghua and Neiswanger, Willie and Jia, Robin},
journal={arXiv preprint arXiv:2604.17338},
year={2026}
}
Contact
Questions / submissions: wangzhu@usc.edu, miaosenc@usc.edu.